Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

Monday, April 7, 2014

Never Again!

1. What are "the Burning Times"?

"The Burning Times" are a period in the late Middle Ages and early Modern Era when Witches were persecuted fiercely throughout Europe. The phrase first appears in the writings of 20th century Witches. Historians generally refer to the Burning Times as "the great European Witch hunt" or "the European Witch-craze".

2. What is a Witch?

Today, Witchcraft is a nature-oriented religion. Historically, the word "Witch" simply referred to someone with magickal power. Any magick-user might be called a Witch regardless of their religion. There were Catholic Witches, Protestant Witches, and Pagan Witches -- and Witches who didn't fit neatly into any of those pigeon-holes!

Unfortunately, historians use the word "Witch" quite differently than most people do. When historians talk about Witches, they generally mean "magickal criminals" (people accused of using harmful magick) or diabolists (people accused of worshiping the Christian Devil). "White" Witches are called "simple sorcerers" instead.

The difference between the academic and common meanings of "Witch" creates a great deal of confusion. History books on Witchcraft only give you half the story: they tell you what life was like for Witches who were accused of diabolism or criminal spell casting. They *don't* tell you what life was like for the average healer, diviner, wise woman, fairy doctor, or cunning man -- because most modern historians don't consider these folk "real" Witches! Readers wrongly assume that all Witches faced the kinds of persecution and horror displayed in the Witchcraft trials.

3. When were the Burning Times?

From 1300 to 1800. Some historians study only the height of the trials (1550-1650), the time when crazes and panics swept Europe. Most, however, begin their study in the 14th century, when Christians first designated Witchcraft a form of heresy.

Before 1300, Witch trials were rare. The only type of Witchcraft punished harshly in the Middle Ages was harmful magick Medievals focused on what you did with your magick. To them, it didn't really matter whether you killed someone with a spell or a sword. Either way, you were a murderer. All this changed in the 14th century when Christian theologians began to diabolize Witchcraft, to insist that there was no such thing as a neutral or non-heretical Witch. Under these new theories, Witches weren't simply people with unusual powers: they were Satanists who traded their souls to the Devil in exchange for worldly power.

Worse, by the 15th century some Christian scholars theorized that Witches belonged to an enormous, Satanic conspiracy. During the Middle Ages, Christians thought that Witches worked alone or in isolated, small groups. Witches were "misguided" victims of "Pagan superstitions" but they weren't particularly dangerous. In the early modern period, however, Christian intellectuals theorized that all Witches worked together, that they were an organized, murderous conspiracy -- the deadly enemies of Christianity. Fear of this non-existent conspiracy grew slowly over the next 150 years, and the number of Witch trials gradually increased during the 14th and 15th centuries.

But the height of the persecution came with the Reformation of the 16th century. Increasing corruption in the Church angered many Christians, and eventually protesters (called "Protestants") split off from the Catholic Church and formed their own churches. This division, called the Reformation, triggered a century of intense religious warfare and persecution.

And intense Witch hunting. For reasons we don't fully understand, the Reformation caused the number of Witch trials to skyrocket. Before the Reformation, there were a couple mass trials, but trials tended to be small and isolated. During the Reformation, enormous panics (Witch crazes) swept most European nations. Persecution was worst from 1550-1650. It slowed from 1650 to 1700 and fell to a trickle in the 18th century (in most countries, anyway). The last European Witch was executed in 1793.

4. Where did the Burning Times occur?

Throughout Europe and in the British American colonies. The persecution was most intense in central Europe, and generally got lighter the further you traveled away from that area.

The worst Witch-hunting occurred in Germany, Switzerland, France, Scotland, and (perhaps) Poland. Thousands of Witches were killed in each of these countries. Germany was the worst hit. Approximately one half of all Witches killed in the Burning Times were German -- an estimated 25,000 people all told.

Moderate Witch-hunting occurred in England, Italy, Spain, Hungary, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland. In all of these countries, hundreds of Witches died. Portugal, Ireland, Iceland, the Baltic countries, Russia and America all killed less than 100 Witches.

5. How many Witches died in the Burning Times?

Probably between 40,000 and 60,000. Some scholars estimate that as many as 100,000 people may have died, but that's as high as current estimates go.

Early estimates were much higher. When we had little information on the Witch trials, scholars used to guess that hundreds of thousands of Witches died. However between 1977 and 1981 a flood of new information became available. Because of it, scholarly estimates dropped from hundreds of thousands to tens of thousands.

Unfortunately, many popular writers aren't aware of this new information. They cling to the older, more sensational numbers, not realizing how little evidence there is to support them. As a result, there is a ton of misinformation available and you will hear wildly unrealistic estimates of the death toll of the Burning Times. But again, experts generally agree that the death toll fell between 40,000 and 60,000; a few guess that as many as 100,000 died.

6. Who was accused of Witchcraft?

Anyone could be accused of Witchcraft. Not even the Pope was safe -- Boniface VIII was accused in 1303. However there are a few generalizations that we can make about the "average" Witch.

Most Witches were women. Women made up approximately 80% of the accused, though this varied dramatically in different times and places. Men were more common in the early trials, comprising a third of those accused before 1500. Some northern countries killed as many men as women, or even more. In Iceland, for instance, 95% of the Witches killed were men. But the centers of the persecution killed far more women than men, sometimes as many as 20 women for every one man.

Accused Witches came from all religions. The majority appear to have been Christians, a smaller number were Pagan or Christo-Pagan. Witches were mainly poor. However some countries allowed a Witch hunter to confiscate his victim's property and in those areas, rich Witches were not uncommon. A significant number of Witches were healers or mid-wives. Percentages vary, but in most areas 20% - 30% of the people accused of Witchcraft either healed or used some form of magick. Elderly people, unmarried women and widows were attacked more frequently.

Why are Witches such a diverse lot? Why can't we pinpoint one characteristic that all Witches in all places shared? Because the Witch hunters weren't persecuting a real group of people. Europeans believed they were threatened by a Satanic conspiracy. There was no conspiracy, so there were no real conspirators for them to assault. Instead, they lashed out at anybody who bore the slightest resemblance to their stereotypes of Satanists.

Satan granted his followers magickal powers and great knowledge -- so mid-wives, magicians, diviners, healers, and scholars were accused. Satan was the father of heresy -- so Pagans, Christo-Pagans, and Christian heretics were killed. Satan encouraged all evils, especially sexual ones -- so gays, sexually independent women, criminals, and "loose" or beautiful women fell under suspicion. All suffering and ugliness was of the Devil, and that made the elderly, the plain, and the handicapped suspect.

7. Who was responsible for the Burning Times?

Everyone. All segments of European society supported the Witch trials: the Church, the Inquisition, secular government, intellectuals, the "common" folk, healers and doctors. Shockingly, even Witches themselves supported the Burning Times.

a) The Church The Christian Church fostered the intense religious intolerance which bred the persecution. Beginning in 1022, the Church started executing "heretics", people who disagreed with its teachings. So when the Burning Times began, Europeans were accustomed to murdering religious dissidents. In fact the traditional method of killing a Witch (burning her at the stake) was the "normal" way of executing heretics.

Witch-hunting was directly linked to religious intolerance. The persecution peaked during the Reformation, one of the worst periods of religious warfare Europe ever experienced. Witch hunting was most intense in religiously divided areas (e.g., Germany and Switzerland) or along the borders where countries with different religions met (e.g., eastern France and northern Italy, both of which bordered Germany).

The Church can honestly say that it killed few Witches. Most religious courts imposed non-lethal penalties, like penance or imprisonment. However the Church encouraged the intolerance and stereotyping that caused the trials, and its custom of murdering dissidents was the direct impetus for executing Witches.

b) The Inquisition

The Inquisition played a small but critical role in the Burning Times. Contrary to what you may have heard, the Inquisition killed very few Witches. The Inquisition investigated charges of Witchcraft from roughly 1300 to 1500, a time when the death rate was quite low. After the Reformation, the Inquisition did not operate in most European nations. So when panics and crazes were sweeping Europe, the Inquisition only existed in two countries: Spain and Italy. Both had low death tolls. In fact the Spanish Inquisition had the best execution rate in all of the Burning Times, killing less than 1% of accused Witches.

That does not mean that the Inquisition's hands were clean. The Holy Office played a crucial role in the persecutions: it diabolized Witchcraft. Inquisitors defined Witchcraft as a heresy, not a Pagan "superstition." That one word spelled the difference between life and death. Superstition was a minor sin, meriting no more than a mild penance. Heretics were killed. Inquisitors like Heinrich Kramer (author of the _Malleus Maleficarum_) wrote the earliest Witch hunting manuals, tracts that spread the fear of Witchcraft throughout Europe. Finally the Inquisition eliminated the good Witch. It insisted that all Witches got their powers from the Devil. There was no such thing as a good or neutral Witch. Even people who healed and divined had sold their souls to Satan.

c) Secular Governments

Secular governments did most of the killing in the Burning Times. Lucky Witches were tried by the Church -- the truly damned had to appear before a secular court. Non-religious courts had the worst acquittal rates. Local tribunals were often virtual slaughterhouses, killing up to 90% of the accused. National courts (run by professional judges) killed around 30%. By comparison, religious courts often killed less than 1% of the people they tried. Secular courts also tried far more Witches than religious ones did. Most of the great Witch crazes were carried out by secular officials.

d) Intellectuals

Most intellectuals supported the Burning Times. There were a handful of brave critics like squire Reginald Scot or doctor Johann Weyer. But most jurists, lawyers, and upper class people accepted and supported the trials.

In fact, after the 15th century Witch hunting manuals were predominantly written by non-religious intellectuals. The earliest manuals came from inquisitors like Heinrich Kramer, Bernard Gui, and Johannes Nider. But when the Reformation arose, the Inquisition turned its attention to hunting Protestants, not Witches. So non-religious intellectuals stepped in to take the Inquisition's place. Men like King James of Scotland, judge Pierre de Lancre, and legal professor Jean Bodin wrote the manuals which were most popular at the height of the persecution.

e) The "Common Folk"

Witch hunting enjoyed intense, wide-spread popular support. Peasants and common folk were active participants in the trials. They -- not professional Witch hunters -- initiated most trials. The "folk" were the most common witnesses against Witches, and they usually cooperated with officials freely. It seems people were happy for a chance to "strike back" against the Witches they believed had cursed their children and livestock.

Witchcraft titillated and fascinated the public. Trials were public spectacles, often attended by hundreds or even thousands of cheering spectators. When the Spanish Inquisition killed six Witches in 1610, over 30,000 people came to watch. The Inquisition had to build special bleachers to hold all the commoners who wanted to see these Witches die. Books on Witch hunting sold like hot cakes. Witch hunting manuals were among the earliest books printed and in England, cheap pamphlet accounts of Witch trials made up a significant portion of the earliest popular literature.

Lynching and vigilantism are the foulest indicators of popular support for Witch hunting. The folk frequently took the law into their own hands when they thought that the courts weren't killing Witches fast enough. Scholars estimate that in some areas as many as 20% - 50% of all Witches were murdered by their neighbors. More commonly, people brutalized suspected Witches. They slashed their faces open with knives, hoping to break a "curse." They murdered Witches' "familiars", threw rocks at their houses, held them underwater until they promised to remove their "hexes." Mob violence lingered on long after the upper classes stopped trying Witches. In fact, Witches continue to be lynched to this very day, though much more rarely than in the past.

f) Healers and doctors

Medical knowledge was pretty remedial in the Burning Times. When a professional healer couldn't cure a disease, he or she often blamed the sickness on Witchcraft. Many writers lambaste doctors for doing this, but wise-women and cunning-men did it just as commonly. Witches weren't the scapegoats of the male "medical establishment" alone; female healers blamed their failures on Witches, too.

This is not to say that most healers were Witch hunters -- many opposed the Burning Times fiercely. Doctors like John Cotta and Johann Weyer wrote scathing criticisms of the Witch trials. Geneva's trials came to a stand-still after the city's surgeons refused to find Witches' marks. A court physician convinced Empress Maria Theresa to outlaw Witch trials in Hungary. And by examining early doctors' case books, we can see that physicians normally found natural explanations for diseases. English doctor Richard Napier had 120 people visit him, complaining that they were the victims of Witchcraft. He found natural causes for all of their illnesses -- no Witch trials resulted from any of these charges.

g) The Witches

Witches actively supported the Burning Times. This may come as a terrible shock to modern Witches. We're used to thinking of ourselves as the innocent victims of the persecution, not as the persecutors. But copious amounts of trial and literary evidence reveal that we stood on both sides of the fence.

During the Burning Times, most people believed that there were two types of Witches: "white" Witches and "black" Witches. (Some Christian extremists disagreed, insisting that all Witches were equally "black".) "White" Witches healed and removed hexes, "black" Witches cursed and killed. Witches generally considered themselves "white" or "good" Witches -- they knew they weren't the type of malevolent Witches the Church raved about. But they were willing to believe that there really was a conspiracy of Satanic Witches, somewhere "out there". And they were willing to accuse their neighbors of belonging to that conspiracy.

Witches supported the Burning Times in two ways. 1) Healing Witches routinely blamed diseases on baneful magick -- more commonly, even, than doctors did. 2) Witches confirmed bewitchment. When a person suspected he was cursed, the standard way of checking was to ask a "white" Witch. Using divination, the Witch would tell him if another Witch was responsible for his misfortunes. If so, the "good" Witch would break the curse and usually divine the name of the "bad" Witch. In many of these cases, their clients turned around and pressed charges against the "bad" Witch. More frequently, they simply went home and harassed or assaulted their maligned neighbor. In either case, the "white" Witch bears part of the blame for the "black" Witch's persecution and/or death. Her "expertise" transformed a farmer's vague fears into a confident "knowledge" that he had been cursed.

The way that "white" Witches treated their "black" sisters in the Burning Times has some chilling echoes in our modern day.

8. Why did the Burning Times happen?

No one knows. For centuries, people have been searching for a simple, logical explanation for the Burning Times. No one's ever found one.

Numerous simple explanations have been proposed. Most are blame-oriented, seeking to shift responsibility for the persecution onto one group of scapegoats. These theories are extremely dualistic, dividing the world into "Good Guys" and "Bad Guys". Evil Christians persecuted good Pagans. Vile male doctors attacked their rivals, the wise and gentle mid-wives. The foul forces of patriarchy sought to undermine the last vestige of women's power. None of these explanations hold up under close examination.

All simple theories ignore huge quantities of counter-evidence. For example, people who say that the Burning Times were the Church's attempt to destroy Paganism ignore two crucial facts: most of the victims of the Burning Times were Christians, not Pagans, and the death toll was always lowest when and where the Church ran the trials. People who blame the trials on misogyny overlook the fact that there's absolutely no correlation between the status of women and the intensity of Witch hunting. Sexism was the norm in the Burning Times, so of course it's simple to point out sexist elements in Witch trials. But the centers of Witch hunting weren't noticeably more sexist than the countries that killed a mere handful of Witches, nor do the beginning and end of the Burning Times correlate to any shifts in women's rights.

The bottom line is, when you look at *all* of the evidence, very few clear patterns emerge. And the ones that do surface don't offer any simple explanations. For example, Witch hunting correlates to religious persecution -- of all sorts. Trials peaked during the religious wars of the Reformation. They're worst in the areas where the Reformation caused the most disruption. They're rarest in places where there was only one religion and no large religious minorities. So how do we interpret this? It seems like religious intolerance caused Witch hunting, but there's no evidence that the trials were one religion's attempt to wipe out another. Any religious persecution -- Protestant vs. Catholic, Catholic vs. heretic, Inquisition vs. Pagan -- increased Witch hunting.

In recent years, most scholars have moved away from the dualistic, blame-oriented explanations of the past. Rather than viewing Witch hunting as a pogrom aimed at a particular group of people, they treat it almost as a disease: a nebulous terror that gripped communities and drove decent people to do insanely awful things. They look for factors that increased a community's chances of succumbing to the "disease" and traits that helped towns resist the "infection."

For example, a strong church or state generally decreased trials, while a religiously diverse community increased them. Panics were localized -- when one town panicked, its neighbors were likely to as well. In fact, Witch trials often spread along roads and trade routes, just like diseases do. Travelers talked about the horrors they'd seen, the wild rumors they'd heard. And so they passed on these fears throughout the land, wherever they went.

Perhaps the easiest way to answer "Why did the Burning Times occur?" is to ask another question: why did the Satanic Panics of the 1980's occur? Why did American communities suddenly become convinced that a criminal Satanic cult was out to harm their children? Again, we aren't sure. But folklorists studying these rumor panics point out striking correlations between the Burning Times and the Satanic Panics. And so there's hope that by studying our own behavior, we may eventually learn what drove our ancestors to commit the atrocities we see in the Burning Times. A mirror may be our best window on the past.

9. Why did the Burning Times stop?

Mainly because people ceased to believe in the power of Witchcraft and in the existence of a Satanic conspiracy.

Rationalists insisted that magick was nonsense. People simply could not do the sorts of things Witches were credited with. Professionals grew increasingly suspicious. Judges and lawyers saw too many abuses, too many people killed on the flimsiest sorts of evidence. Even people who insisted that there really was a Satanic conspiracy had to admit that hundreds of innocents were dying. Many decided that it was better to let the guilty escape than to persecute the innocent.

The common folk were the strongest advocates of the Burning Times and continued to demand trials long after the courts refused to condemn Witches. Lynching and mob violence rose at the end of the Burning Times, and scattered murders and assaults peppered the 19th century. But without the support of the upper classes, the great persecutions vanished. People could accuse Witches all they wanted -- but if the authorities weren't willing to try Witches, the Burning Times disappeared.

Found on the hall of remembrance

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

History of the Barber Pole


In the Middle Ages, hair was not the only thing that barbers cut. They also performed surgery, tooth extractions, and bloodletting. French authorities drew a fine distinction between academic surgeons (surgeons of the long robe) and barber surgeons (surgeons of the short robe), but the latter were sufficiently accepted by the fourteenth century to have their own guild, and in 1505 they were admitted to the faculty of the University of Paris. As an indication of their medical importance, Harry Perelman points out that Ambroise Pare, "The father of modern surgery and the greatest surgeon of the Renaissance," began as a barber surgeon.

The barber pole as a symbol of the profession is a legacy of bloodletting. The barber surgeon's necessities for that curious custom were a staff for the patient to grasp (so the veins on the arm would stand out sharply), a basin to hold leeches and catch blood, and a copious supply of linen bandages. After the operation was completed, the bandages would be hung on the staff and sometimes placed outside as advertisement. Twirled by the wind, they would form a red white spiral pattern that was later adopted for painted poles. The earliest poles were surmounted by a leech basin, which in time was transformed into a ball.

One Interpretation of the colors of the barber pole was that Red represented the blood, Blue the veins, and White the bandages. Which has been retained by the modern Barber-Stylist.

Borrowed from:
http://www.northeastmarketplace.com/Jays/history.htm

Monday, December 17, 2012

Who is Santa Claus



By Lady SpringWolf

[all grammatical & spelling errors are from the original article]

As we pagans already know, many of today's Christmas celebrations are rooted in pagan practices. And Santa isn't an exception.

The winter solstice is a time to celebrate the return of the sun following the shortest day in the year. It's no wonder the church adopted these holidays as the birth date of their Savior. But from ancient Celtic and Norse mythology we also enjoy such holiday traditions as holly and mistletoe (sacred to the druids), the yule log, and even Santa Claus in his aspects of Father Time, or Father Winter, or the Holly King as part of our Yule History.

The Pagan Origins:
We have to go back a bit find the pagan legend and myth associated with Santa. One of the first places to start is with the Germanic people and the Norse God Odin. The 13th Century Poetic Edda is a complication of stories and poems from Scandinavian history, some as early 985AD. In this work and from Snorri Sturluson's Prose Edda we learn about Odin riding an eight-legged horse named Sleipnir, that can leap great distances. At Yule, Odin leads a great hunting party through the sky in celebration. This story gives rise to comparisons of Santa and his 8 reindeer flying through the sky.

In some traditions of Odin's Yule time ride, children could place their boots near the chimney filled with treats for Sleipnir and Odin would reward them for their kindness with food, candy or gifts. The tradition still continues Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. In other Germanic countries the practice has been replaced with hanging stockings.

On the Celtic side, the origins of the Holly King are little dubious, but there are links to the Great Kings of Ireland and the legend of the Holly King. With going too far into the history of Ireland, Between 8000-7500 BCE the Ice bridge between Scotland and Ireland collapses. Tribes of around 50,000 to 60,000 hunter gatherers are now "trapped" in Ireland. The population dwindles to about 10,000 as animals and food run out sustaining themselves in a variety of methods, including the consumption of mildly poisonous Holly berries. Around 6500-5500 BCE the Cuilleain ("Holly" (holy) men step onto the scene. Also known as the "Shining Ones" of Wicklow Hills, these men save the dwindling population from barbarity and are the first priest kings to preach self-wisdom, organized religion for humanity and salvation. Through their efforts to save their people, some of these early Priest Kings sacrifice their lives in battle. From these early priest kings, the concept of the Holly King who saved his people from the depths of the winter ice is born.

Through these early mythical legends, The Holly King begins his battle with his twin brother the Oak King at the Summer Solstice. As the year is wanning the Holly King prevails and begins preparations to save and maintain his people through the cold winter. In order to accomplish his mission, he travels the land to hunt, fish and harvest. Transporting these life saving items in a wagon or sled pulled by eight deer. These 'gifts' of life are provided to all his people, and in exchange they provide care and comfort to his team of deer.

There is also suggestion that the 8 reindeer plays pagan significance. Just follow along here, it comes together in the end. Even in those ancient times the number 9 was an important spiritual number. 9 witches often made up a coven. 9 feet was the diameter of a perfect circle. And maybe that's why "the whole 9 yards"; which refers to the 9 yards of material for a Great Kilt worn by many Celtic highlanders is so important. When we think of Santa we think of Santa and his 8 tiny reindeer. And most people focus on the 8 reindeer. Well now add Santa. 9 souls traveling through the winter sky to bring presents for the rebirth of the year. It's a stretch, but there are those who believe this is where the 8 reindeer got their start.

The Holly King lived way up North, where he could survive in the cold during the reign of his brother in the spring and summer. The Oak King who needed the warmth to survive, lived in the warm forests in the south and falls into sleep while his brother of the cold reigns over the world during the fall and winter months.

Ancient pagan deities such as Befana (a gift-giving Roman goddess); the Holly King (a Celtic Winter god); and Thor and Tomte (Norse gods who, respectively, rode across the sky in a chariots drawn by goats and gave presents to children at the end of the year) have all fed into the Santa legend.

In many of these early pagan legends, presents are given to children or young families to represent abundance and fertility. After all this is the time of the rebirth of the Sun. Presents were exchanged to honor that rebirth and to give wishes or hopes to the person receiving the gift for abundance and fertility in the coming year. Now don't assume that 'fertility' means giving birth to a child. Remember these people had to live off the earth and the crops they grew. They didn't have grocery stores on the corner to trot down to and buy food for their families. So in most cases the fertility was for the coming growing season.

Santa didn't become a Christian figure until the 3rd century with Nicholas, the Bishop of Myra. He lived on what is now the coast of Turkey. Nicholas suffered for his faith, was exiled and imprisoned. After his release, Nicholas attended the Council of Nicaea in AD 325. He died December 6, AD which became a festive day to honor this Bishop and his life. It's still a day recognized in many European countries as St. Nicholas Day. His parents died in an epidemic while Nicholas was still young. Obeying Jesus' words to "sell what you own and give the money to the poor," Nicholas used his whole inheritance to assist the needy, the sick, and the suffering. Many stories are told of his generosity, and caring. Especially his protection and care of children. Because of his life work, he became synonymous with Santa Claus. Though many of the stories retold today cannot be verified and are likely just oral stories that were created to entertain children and to further incorporate pagan legends with Christian figures.

It's impossible to point to the one real 'first' Santa, because Santa is a culmination of mythological legends and stories. But from many of the earliest pagan stories and legends we can find pieces of the Santa legend in our Celtic and Scandinavian mythologies

The Evolution Of Santa:
Santa gets his name from Dutch legend in the form of Sinter Klaas or "Sinterklaas". Historical documents suggest that Sinter was brought by settlers to New York in the 17th century. As early as 1773 the name appeared in the American press as "St. A Claus," but it was the popular author Washington Irving who gave Americans their first detailed information about the Dutch version of Saint Nicholas. In his History of New York, published in 1809 under the pseudonym Diedrich Knickerbocker, Irving described the arrival of the saint on horseback (unaccompanied by Black Peter) each Eve of Saint Nicholas.

This Dutch-American Saint Nick achieved his fully Americanized form in 1823 in the poem A Visit From Saint Nicholas more commonly known as The Night Before Christmas by writer Clement Clarke Moore. Moore included such details as the names of the reindeer; Santa Claus's laughs, winks, and nods; and the method by which Saint Nicholas, referred to as an elf, returns up the chimney. (Moore's phrase "lays his finger aside of his nose" was drawn directly from Irving's 1809 description.)

There are many Celtic scholars who point Santa's beginnings to the Celtic Holly King, who has been depicted with a Holly wreath as a crown. Or as the Druid Holly King who wore holly in his hat. In both cases, the Holly King traditionally wore green garments with red accents. What else would a "holly" king wear.

His clothing seems to have changed color in the late 1800s when Santa started wearing the modern red. The Dutch "Sinterklaas" is an elderly, serious man with white hair and a long, full beard. He wears a long red cape over a traditional white bishop's alb. Some point to the influence of the Catholic church and it's attire for the different levels of the Priest Hierarchy for this color combination.

In the 1840s, an elf in Nordic folklore called "Tomte" or "Nisse" started to deliver the Christmas presents in Denmark. The Tomte was portrayed as a short, bearded man dressed in gray clothes and a red hat. As migrations of people traveled through Scandinavia their traditional influences also began to merge. By the end of the 19th Century, Norway and Sweden had also began integrating these images into their winter cultural celebrations. Most notably replacing the Yule Goat, who brought presents with the Dutch influenced Sinterklaas.

British and Dutch versions of the gift-giver merged even more as migrations from Europe came to the Americas. "Santa Claus" by name, was first used in the American press in 1773, but he had lost his bishop’s apparel, and was at first pictured as a thick-bellied Dutch sailor with a pipe in a green winter coat. The influence of Scandinavian cultures continued as "A New-year's present, to the little ones from five to twelve" is published in New York in 1821. In this little seasonal book, an annonymos poem "Old Santeclaus" is described as an old man on a reindeer sleigh, bringing presents to children. Later in 1823, The Sentinel in Troy New York prints "A Vist From St. Nicholas", better known today as "The Night Before Christmas". In this poem and story Santa is still a small old elf and the original reindeer were named Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Dunder and Blixem (Dunder and Blixem came from the old Dutch words for thunder and lightning, which were later changed to the more German sounding Donner and Blitzen).

One of the first modern images of Santa came in 1863 by American cartoonist Thomas Nast for Harper's Weekly. In 1869 a color collection of Nast's pictures were published in which Santa appears in a red suit. This collection included a poem by George Webster "Santa Claus and His Works", which places Santa's home near the North Pole in the ice and snow. Images of Santa in red became more popular in the large cities of the east and midwest, but it still hadn't caught on throughout the rural countryside or even around the world.

By the 1900s additional images depicting Santa in a red suit sprang up each season furthering the image around the country.
Regional images however still held onto old cultural traditions. This was especially true throughout Europe. It wasn't until the Coca-Cola Company commissioned Michigan-born illustrator Haddon Sundblom to develop advertising images using Santa Claus in 1930, that his image began it's world wide view as we know it today. Even though Sundblom didn't invent the image of Santa in a red coat, their advertising strongly helped emphasize this image into rural American and around the world. Like Nast before him, Sundblom made his version a human-sized version of Santa Claus, rather than the elf of Moore's poem. [Coke Lore & Santa History]. In modern versions of the Santa Claus legend, only his toy-shop workers are elves.

Similarities:
Modern Christmas traditions have a lot more in common with Pagan legends and practices than some want to admit. Just knowing there might be an association between the two can cause some fundamentalists to discard centuries of celebration for fear of aligning their beliefs with Paganism. But the fact is, through our evolution, humanity began it's walk here on Earth through honoring and worshiping nature. They had to in order to survive. At some point everything and everyone in the world was some type of Pagan practitioner. So it's reasonable to think that as humans evolved, so did their beliefs. But that doesn't mean they totally discarded all of those early perceptions. We influence each other each and every day. And certainly our past influences our views and beliefs today.

We are all much more a like than we are different. And there is enough room in the world for each of us to honor the Divine force in our life, without degrading or impeding the choices of others to honor and practice in their own way too. After all, on both sides of the fence, Christian, Pagan, or Jew isn't that what this time of the year is all about? Peace and compassion?

Wednesday, July 18, 2012